Heuristic Cues for Meta-Reasoning Judgments
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Reasoning and intuiting the standards for judgments
What is the extension to which the act of reasoning and the standards of judgments are interrelated? The author, proposing Muslim scholars` views in the field and relying on traditions, ahadith, has concluded that firstly one has to answer the question: does the standard and expediency of Divine judgment lies in the judgment or in its object? The latter is signified, however, with view to so...
متن کاملHybrid Meta-heuristic Algorithm for Task Assignment Problem
Task assignment problem (TAP) involves assigning a number of tasks to a number of processors in distributed computing systems and its objective is to minimize the sum of the total execution and communication costs, subject to all of the resource constraints. TAP is a combinatorial optimization problem and NP-complete. This paper proposes a hybrid meta-heuristic algorithm for solving TAP in a ...
متن کاملA Logic for Reasoning about Generic Judgments
This paper presents an extension of a proof system for encoding generic judgments, the logic FOλ∆∇ of Miller and Tiu, with an induction principle. The logic FOλ∆∇ is itself an extension of intuitionistic logic with fixed points and a “generic quantifier”, ∇, which is used to reason about the dynamics of bindings in object systems encoded in the logic. A previous attempt to extend FOλ∆∇ with an ...
متن کاملThe Heuristic Reasoning Manifesto
We argue for heuristic reasoning as a solution to the brittleness problem. Heuristic reasoning methods exploit the information processing structure of the reasoning system and the structure of the environment to produce reasonable answers when knowledge and/or computational resources for finding the perfect correct answer might not exist. Capturing all the heuristics to generate reasonable answ...
متن کاملA Framework for Heuristic Reasoning About Uncertainty
This paper describes a theory of reasoning about uncertainly, based on a representation of state'i of certainly called endorsements (see Cohen and Grinberg, 1983, for a more detailed discussion of the theory.) The theory of endorsements is an alternative to numerical methods for reasoning about uncertainty, such as subjective Bayesian methods (Shortliffe and Buchanan, 1975; Duda, Hart, and Nils...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Psihologijske teme
سال: 2019
ISSN: 1849-0395,1332-0742
DOI: 10.31820/pt.28.1.1